Comments on: Understand the iPod iTunesDB http://www.walking-productions.com/notslop/2005/10/31/understand-the-ipod-itunesdb/ Not - Shawn's Little Outpost Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:16:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Cirbirus http://www.walking-productions.com/notslop/2005/10/31/understand-the-ipod-itunesdb/#comment-203 Cirbirus Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:46:28 +0000 http://www.walking-productions.com/notslop/2005/10/31/understand-the-ipod-itunesdb/#comment-203 Not only are the database files horribly designed the COM interface is purposely broken and buggy. It's amazing how poorly written iTunes is as well. Not only are the database files horribly designed the COM interface is purposely broken and buggy. It’s amazing how poorly written iTunes is as well.

]]> By: shawn http://www.walking-productions.com/notslop/2005/10/31/understand-the-ipod-itunesdb/#comment-202 shawn Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:44:32 +0000 http://www.walking-productions.com/notslop/2005/10/31/understand-the-ipod-itunesdb/#comment-202 How many songs is 150GB? I think that this is describing how this information is stored on the iPod not how iTunes stores the information on your computer. Then again, could be the same.. In any case, SQL is to easy for a programmer/hacker. Apple would never! ;-) Did you see my trackback or is this just a random coincidence? How many songs is 150GB? I think that this is describing how this information is stored on the iPod not how iTunes stores the information on your computer. Then again, could be the same.. In any case, SQL is to easy for a programmer/hacker. Apple would never! ;-)

Did you see my trackback or is this just a random coincidence?

]]> By: Dennis http://www.walking-productions.com/notslop/2005/10/31/understand-the-ipod-itunesdb/#comment-201 Dennis Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:15:04 +0000 http://www.walking-productions.com/notslop/2005/10/31/understand-the-ipod-itunesdb/#comment-201 iTunesDB is horribly inefficient after you have about 150GB of music loaded into the system. I'd like to see their indexing algorithms. They should've used an embedded SQL database. I think their current format is similar to BerkleyDB. iTunesDB is horribly inefficient after you have about 150GB of music loaded into the system. I’d like to see their indexing algorithms. They should’ve used an embedded SQL database. I think their current format is similar to BerkleyDB.

]]>